To meet with mathematicians, physicists, philosophers and curious, discussing the postulate poverty and happiness of my authorship, you came to the conclusion that poverty and happiness are inversely proportional and not relative says the " philosopher " Felipe Lorenzo de el Río.Se must keep in mind, that regard are different readings given by observers in different positions with respect to a same experiment. Read the relativity of Albert Einstein and the open dictionary, read related recreational sets. POSDATAUn ten times-poor man and a tenth of happy, is poorer and less happy than a three times-poor man and one-third of happy.
Respecting the somewhat guasón postulate of Cuba Ricardo I think that poverty and happiness are always on the personal and social situation in which each of us live, having personally important subjective and social component more component objective. The poverty would be the lack of enough to live with dignity, materially and culturally; clear that some feel poor and unhappy with all the gold in the world and therefore want to have more because they don't want to share. About happiness, remember that in a kind of philosophy with my students, we come to this definition: the progressive abolition of absences not only on the line of having but also and above all in the the be. I.e., we are happier that we are acquiring things that make our life easier and above all in so far as we are going to be best people we know more, we respect and share more with others.
