Meaning of totalitarismo ecológico by John Rene Plaut

ECOLOGICAL TOTALITARISM Isaac Asimov, chemist, professor, science fiction writer, scientific and articleist discloser, wrote a lot, particularly because he had a sleep sickness that did not allow him to sleep more than two hours a day. One day he came to finish his hundredth work and instituted it Opus 100. Over time he wrote Opus 200 and Opus 300, reaching 781. Amazing. This contribution is my number 5000, and in your honor I will call it Opus 5000. I'll try to make it how good he deserves. Totalitarianism is the doctrine of absolute or total power in a person, the dictator, who dictates the rules, and commands without counterweights. Fascism, Nazism and communism are totalitarian doctrines, all of socialist ideology, in which the concept of sharing and solidarity predominates. Capitalism proposes freedom to the individual and right of ownership over the wealth it generates, with an adequate redistribution of such wealth (taxes) all linked within a democratic framework Now, there are those who go the third way, "neither chicha (wine) nor lemonade", without marrying any, as was the case with the Peronism of Argentina, the thirdism raised by Tony Blair and the formation of Non-Aligned Countries after the Second War. Environmentalism has been the communist party's new workhorse since the fall of the Berlin Wall (Greenpeace is an anti-capitalist political-environmental NGO). And we have seen the various political fronts appropriate environmentalism as their own and simultaneously use it to discredit the ideology of opposition. Even thirdists incorporate environmentalism adapted to their own ideology, whether this anarchist or independenceist. Now, there appears eco-fascism, or ecological totalitarianism that associates environmentalism with fascism, linking extreme environmentalism with neo-fascism. It is labeled by adversaries to refer to nationalists and thirdists. The term eco-phasism is also used from the political right to accuse the deep-green political project, traditional ecologism and other left-wing and non-left positions of antihumanism. The left, in turn, disqualifies non-leftists like those of deep ecology, who defend themselves by claiming that they are epithets created to discredit them.