Antitype: It is when humans, facts or things involved are similes each other in a historical example, but outside of that example because they are not similar but opposite. For example. removed from the book of biblical hermeneutics of J.M. Martinez, of Editorial CLIE. On page 176 paragraph 2 States: between the type and the antitype must have important analogy somewhere, although also notable differences in the comparison of both ( 41 differences; Jonas is Christ 40 type;Mt. 12: 40 ) but the typological relationship between one and the other is only established between the permanence of the Prophet " in the belly of the fish three days and three nights " followed by his release, and the burial of the LORD JESUS, followed by his resurrection. The " type " It is perfectly valid ( only in this example, but outside the example, Jonah for his character is antagonistic, or antitype of the LORD JESUS ) because Jonah was rebellious, racist, irascible and has nothing in common with the man who is meek, humble of heart, obedient, loving and friend of sinners. Then Jonah out of the similarity of the three days in the belly of the fish, is completely different from the LORD JESUS, that also Jonas is an antitype of JESUS.In paragraph 1 of the same page says: both the type and the antitype are historical realities that correspond. As example of another style of " 34 antitype;: use the fight of David against Goliath as a " type " to model Christian character at the moral level is a mistake; If I can use this experience to allegorise and illustrate; but to use the whole life of King David as " type " of Christian morality is a mistake, this is a " 34 antitype; but say that David's heart was in accordance with the heart of God for the fact that it was sensitive to hear God's voice, or sensitive to accept their mistakes and that it should be a Christian, so can be used " type " and in the manner above as we said " antitype " ( 1Sam. 13: 14; Acts 13: 22 )
